Case 2406923/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Cunliffe v Royal College of Nursing — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406923/2022
- Decision date
- 5 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Cunliffe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Dunlop at Manchester by video on 10 May 2023. The tribunal determined as a preliminary issue that Mrs A Cunliffe was not a disabled person within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the time of the alleged discrimination, said to be between May 2021 and September 2022.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination on grounds of disability; dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant was not a disabled person within s.6 Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability; dismissed because the claimant was found not to be disabled within s.6 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments; dismissed because the claimant was found not to be disabled within s.6 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.