Case 2406948/2022 · Employment Tribunal
U Miller v Globe Motors Vehicle Specialist Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406948/2022
- Decision date
- 10 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
U Miller
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 18 April 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
Employment Judge Holmes therefore struck out the claim. The judgment contains no merits determination and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separately discuss this pleaded head of claim; it records that the claim as a whole was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not separately discuss this pleaded head of claim; it records that the claim as a whole was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.