Case 2407043/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Lacey v We Love Dogs Rossendale Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2407043/2024
- Decision date
- 9 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Lacey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 12 May 2025, the tribunal gave Mrs S Lacey an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no findings on the underlying merits of the pleaded claims and no monetary remedy was awarded. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Phil Allen on 6 June 2025 and sent to the parties on 9 July 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the claim as not actively pursued. The text does not separate outcomes by individual claim head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the claim as not actively pursued. The text does not separate outcomes by individual claim head. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.