Case 2407067/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. T. Welch v Innseagan House t/a Portsonachan Hotel — 2025
- Case reference
- 2407067/2024
- Decision date
- 7 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. T. Welch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time and did not attend. Judge Callan therefore determined the claim under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024. The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to provide pay slips in contravention of section 8 ERA 1996 from 1 April 2024 onwards and ordered payment of 13 weeks' pay, assessed at £3,749.98 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages. It ordered payment of £3,269 net in respect of SSP due for 13 August 2024 to 28 January 2025, £3,181.82 gross unpaid wages for 1 June 2024 to 12 August 2024, and £99.77 gross unpaid employer pension contributions for 1 April 2024 to 12 August 2024. The claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed because the claimant had not taken any leave and her employment continued. The total sum awarded was £10,300.57.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Failure to provide pay slips in contravention of section 8 ERA 1996; the tribunal ordered payment of 13 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £3,750 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions comprised £3,269 net SSP due for 13 August 2024 to 28 January 2025, £3,181.82 gross unpaid wages for 1 June 2024 to 12 August 2024, and £99.77 gross unpaid employer pension contributions for 1 April 2024 to 12 August 2024. | Upheld | — | £6,551 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay dismissed because the claimant did not take any leave and her employment continued. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,301
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £10,301
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.