Case 2407103/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Ahmed v ITS Testing Services (UK) Limited HELD AT: Manchester by CVP — 2024
- Case reference
- 2407103/2023
- Decision date
- 22 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fearon REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Ahmed
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester by CVP on 12 March 2024 before Employment Judge Fearon. The claimant, Mrs S Ahmed, appeared in person and the respondent, ITS Testing Services (UK) Limited, was represented by Mr B Ross, solicitor.
The tribunal found that the respondent did not breach the claimant's contract of employment. On that basis, the claimant's breach of contract complaint was held not to be well founded and was dismissed. The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction of wages, again finding that it was not well founded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the respondent did not breach the claimant's contract of employment and dismissed the complaint as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction of wages as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.