Case 2407105/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Agha v JT Griffiths Sewing Solutions Limited and 2 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 2407105/2023
- Decision date
- 1 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr J Agha
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mr J Agha, had not attended the Preliminary Hearing. By letter dated 5 July 2024, the Tribunal gave him an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
Mr Agha did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Phil Allen ordered that the claim be struck out.
The judgment contains no findings on the underlying pleaded causes of action, no liability determination on the merits, and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not adjudicate the merits of the pleaded claims; it strikes out the claim as not actively pursued after the claimant did not attend the Preliminary Hearing and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 5 July 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.