Case 2407106/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Gordon v Jeremy Guest — 2024
- Case reference
- 2407106/2023
- Decision date
- 16 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Gordon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 8 November 2023, the Tribunal gave Miss L Gordon an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claims should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued. That step followed an earlier letter from the Tribunal dated 15 September 2023, to which the claimant had also failed to respond.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient written representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims. The reasons do not include any substantive determination of the merits of the pleaded claims, and no findings were made on liability or remedy.
The preliminary hearing fixed for 9 April 2024 and the final hearing listed for 15, 16 and 17 January 2025 were vacated as a result of the strike-out. The judgment records that the claims were struck out for non-prosecution, and no award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment reasons do not identify the individual pleaded allegations; this claim type follows the gov.uk listing category for the case. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment reasons do not identify the individual pleaded allegations; this claim type follows the gov.uk listing category for the case. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment reasons do not identify the individual pleaded allegations; this claim type follows the gov.uk listing category for the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.