Case 2407118/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v DJPP Leisure Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2407118/2022
- Decision date
- 12 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr J Boyle, brought a holiday pay / accrued annual leave claim against DJPP Leisure Limited. The respondent did not attend the hearing and did not file an ET3. Employment Judge Fredericks heard the matter at Manchester via CVP on 11 January 2023.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant in respect of accrued annual leave that remained untaken at the end of the employment in May 2022. It found that the claimant was owed 70 hours of annual leave for the 2022 holiday year.
Using the rate of £10.00 per hour, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £700.00, subject to the usual deductions as if paid in the course of employment. The accompanying notice explained that interest would be payable only if the award remained unpaid after the relevant decision day, but no separate interest amount was assessed in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant for accrued annual leave that was untaken at the end of employment in May 2022. The tribunal found the claimant was owed 70 hours for the 2022 holiday year at £10.00 per hour, producing a gross award of £700.00 subject to usual deductions. | Upheld | — | £700 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £700
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.