Case 2407119/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Bell v We Do Recover CIC (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2407119/2023
- Decision date
- 26 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Bell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claim under Rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment states that a determination could properly be made on the papers.
The only substantive finding recorded is that Mr C Bell was dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis, the tribunal held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,713.
The written decision also included a notice about interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that the relevant decision day was 26 November 2024 and that interest would accrue from 27 November 2024 at 8% per annum if the award remained unpaid after 14 days. No separate interest amount was calculated in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal determined the case on the papers under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment records that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,713. | Upheld | — | £1,713 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,713
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.