Case 2407135/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Roberts v Genesis Monitoring Solutions Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2407135/2022
- Decision date
- 19 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Roberts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent admitted in its response to the claim that it was liable to the claimant for unpaid accrued annual leave entitlement. Because no part of the claim was contested, the Employment Judge determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £477, calculated as 47.7 accrued hours at a £10 hourly rate. The judgment records that the hearing listed for 5 January 2023 was cancelled.
The accompanying interest notice states that interest would be payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sum was not paid in full within 14 days after the written record of the decision was sent to the parties. It records the relevant decision day as 19 December 2022 and the stipulated rate of interest as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The respondent admitted liability in its response for unpaid accrued annual leave entitlement. The Employment Judge made a Rule 21 determination and ordered payment of the gross sum of £477, calculated as 47.7 accrued hours at £10 per hour. | Upheld | — | £477 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £477
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.