Case 2407136/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O M Aslan v Network Plus Services Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2407136/2023
- Decision date
- 23 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Serr REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O M Aslan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Manchester by CVP on 13 October 2023 before Employment Judge Serr, the claimant, Mr O M Aslan, pursued claims for unlawful deduction of wages and breach of contract against Network Plus Services Ltd. The respondent's name was amended by consent to Network Plus Services Ltd.
The tribunal found that both claims were not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to present them in time. On that basis, both the unlawful deduction of wages claim and the breach of contract claim were dismissed.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal rules. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to do so within time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to do so within time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.