Case 2407146/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J King v Grace Fabrication Limited (in compulsory liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2407146/2022
- Decision date
- 22 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J King
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal issued a judgment striking out the claim against Grace Fabrication Limited (in compulsory liquidation). The reason given was procedural: by a letter dated 15 February 2024, the Tribunal gave Mr J King an opportunity to confirm that he had applied to have the respondent company restored to the Register of Companies.
Mr King did not comply with the Tribunal's order of 15 February 2024. He did not confirm that he had applied to restore the company to the Register of Companies for the purpose of proceeding with the claim, and he did not confirm that he intended to take that step. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim under rules 38 and 37(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment does not determine the substantive merits of the pleaded claims. No compensation or other monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Part of the claim was struck out under rules 38 and 37(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 after the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order about restoring the respondent company to the Register of Companies. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Part of the claim was struck out under rules 38 and 37(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 after the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order about restoring the respondent company to the Register of Companies. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Part of the claim was struck out under rules 38 and 37(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 after the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order about restoring the respondent company to the Register of Companies. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rules 38 and 37(1)(c) and (d) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.