Case 2407156/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Ward v Auxilium Developments Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2407156/2023
- Decision date
- 25 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Ward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr J Ward against Auxilium Developments Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,980. No separate breakdown of the award was given beyond that figure, and the attached notice explained that interest would apply if the judgment remained unpaid after 14 days from the relevant decision day.
No discrimination, dismissal, or other separate claims were recorded in the extracted judgment text. The decision is limited to the unlawful deduction from wages claim and the monetary order made on that claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 and found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £1,980 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,980
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.