Case 2407158/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ashley Askin v P A A Leisure Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2407158/2022
- Decision date
- 6 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ashley Askin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Ashley Askin brought a claim for unpaid holiday pay against P A A Leisure Limited. He sought full pay for 28 days of carried-over leave from the 2020-2021 holiday year, during which he had been on furlough.
The tribunal dismissed the claim. It accepted the respondent's position that, when paying for the carried-over annual leave, it was entitled under regulation 16(5) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 to offset the 80% furlough pay it had already paid to the claimant throughout the relevant leave period.
The judgment records that the complaint was brought to an end on that basis. Written reasons were not provided because the tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claimed full pay for 28 days of carried over leave from the 2020-2021 holiday year while on furlough; the tribunal held the respondent was entitled under regulation 16(5) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 to offset the 80% furlough pay already paid during the relevant leave period. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulation 16(5) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.