Case 2407161/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Landrum v B&M Retail Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2407161/2021
- Decision date
- 21 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Landrum
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that Mrs K Landrum brought claims of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal against B & M Retail Limited. The hearing took place remotely by CVP before Employment Judge Robinson sitting alone.
The judgment states that both the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims failed and were dismissed. The written judgment does not set out the reasons, noting that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim of unfair dismissal fails and is dismissed. Written reasons are not included in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states that the claim of wrongful dismissal fails and is dismissed. Although the listing category refers to breach of contract, the judgment itself identifies the adjudicated claim as wrongful dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.