Case 2407188/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Adam Jubb v Veritas Data Sciences Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2407188/2021
- Decision date
- 21 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Farrelly REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Adam Jubb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Adam Jubb, worked for Veritas Data Sciences Limited as a sales adviser from 15 February 2021 to 19 April 2021. The tribunal accepted that the contract arose from an offer of employment dated 21 January 2021 and the claimant's attendance for work. It also found that payments during the short employment were irregular, with the papers showing a series of salary and commission payments in March and April 2021.
On the wage claim, the tribunal examined the bank statements and the text messages between the parties. It inferred that the final payment of £1,406.64 on 15 April 2021 related to March earnings rather than April work, because the texts indicated March earnings were payable on 15 April and the claimant had only worked part of April. The tribunal therefore accepted that April wages and April commission remained unpaid and awarded £781.04 for April wages and £80 for commission, making a total award of £861.04.
The reasons also record that the claimant was not provided with a payslip for April 2021, but no separate monetary sum is set out for that issue in the operative judgment. By contrast, the tribunal found that the claimant had been issued with a statement of terms and conditions of employment and had accepted it, so that claim was not established.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award comprised £781.04 for April 2021 wages and £80 commission. The tribunal inferred that the £1,406.64 payment on 15 April 2021 related to March earnings rather than April work. | Upheld | — | £861 |
| Other | The reasons record that the claimant was not provided with a payslip for April 2021. No separate monetary sum is set out for this issue. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal found that the claimant was issued with a statement of terms and conditions of employment, which he accepted. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £861
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- sections 8 to 12 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.