Case 2407193/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Christopher Trousdale v The Little Greene Paint Company Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2407193/2021
- Decision date
- 27 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Serr Representation
- Venue
- Manchester via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Christopher Trousdale
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester via CVP on 20 September 2021 before Employment Judge Serr, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel. The tribunal recorded that the claimant brought claims for unfair dismissal and breach of contract.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and dismissed it. It also held that the breach of contract claim was not well founded and dismissed it. No monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
The written record notes that reasons for the judgment had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The extracted judgment text does not include the tribunal’s detailed reasoning, so no further findings can be safely extracted from the record provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.