Case 2407234/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Kotalakidis v Roski Restaurant Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2407234/2024
- Decision date
- 30 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Kotalakidis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 22. It found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £999.
The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,093.50. The unfair dismissal claim was struck out because the claimant had less than the two years' service required for such a complaint, and the claimant agreed that the complaint could not be considered.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and orders payment of the gross sum of £999. | Upheld | — | £999 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and orders payment of £1,093.50. | Upheld | — | £1,094 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the unfair dismissal claim is struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and agreed that such a complaint could not be considered. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,093
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024 - Rule 22
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.