Case 2407245/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Walsh v Dewlay Products Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2407245/2021
- Decision date
- 16 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Walsh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr G Walsh brought a complaint against Dewlay Products Ltd concerning payment of accrued holiday pay on the termination of his working relationship. Employment Judge Robinson, sitting alone at Manchester remotely by CVP on 19 August 2021, held that the complaint was not well-founded.
The judgment records that, as a result, the claim for holiday pay and unlawful deduction of wages was dismissed. No monetary award was made. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time, so the extracted text contains no further findings or legal analysis.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the complaint that the respondent failed to pay accrued holiday pay on termination was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for holiday pay and unlawful deduction of wages was dismissed; no separate reasoning or remedy was given. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.