Case 2407250/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Mackinlay v James & Moore Limited t/a Leach’s Lawnmowers — 2022
- Case reference
- 2407250/2021
- Decision date
- 1 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rhodes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Mackinlay
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Rhodes, sitting alone in Manchester, found that James & Moore Limited t/a Leach's Lawnmowers made an unauthorised deduction from Miss J Mackinlay's wages. The tribunal held that the deduction occurred in March 2021 and that the amount deducted was £557.35 gross, before deductions for tax and national insurance.
The judgment therefore upheld the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim and ordered the respondent to pay £557.35. The written notice attached to the judgment explained the usual interest arrangements under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, but the judgment itself did not quantify any separate interest award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in March 2021 and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £557 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £557
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.