Case 2407263/2023 · Employment Tribunal
D Boden v Hydrus Plumbing and Heating Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2407263/2023
- Decision date
- 29 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
D Boden
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Buzzard entered judgment under Rule 21 against Hydrus Plumbing and Heating Limited (in voluntary liquidation). The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered it to pay £780.00 gross to the claimant.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in relation to unpaid expenses and ordered damages of £100.00. The extracted text includes a separate interest notice stating that the relevant decision day was 29 November 2023 and that the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum, but no separate interest sum is set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £780.00. | Upheld | — | £780 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract concerning unpaid expenses and ordered damages of £100.00. | Upheld | — | £100 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £880
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.