Case 2407297/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Bamber v Care Solutions Liverpool Limited (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2407297/2023
- Decision date
- 24 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Bamber
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Leach therefore made a determination on the liability aspects of the claim on the papers.
The tribunal found that Miss S Bamber had been constructively and unfairly dismissed. The judgment did not set out a remedy figure at this stage and stated that remedy would be determined at a hearing.
The complaint of victimisation was dismissed. The judgment also recorded that any amounts due in respect of arrears of pay and pension contributions would be determined at a hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Found under Rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Remedy was to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Found under Rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Remedy was to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Victimisation | Dismissed in the default judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.