Case 2407315/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms V Bukya v Twill London Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2407315/2023
- Decision date
- 7 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms V Bukya
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 29 January 2025 before Employment Judge Slater. Neither the claimant, Ms V Bukya, nor the respondent, Twill London Limited, attended the hearing.
The written judgment records that the claim was dismissed because of the claimant's failure to attend, under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The judgment does not set out any findings on the underlying merits of the dispute and does not identify the substantive claim(s) in the body of the decision.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 7 February 2025. No remedy was awarded and no reasons beyond the attendance-based dismissal were provided in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim(s); it dismisses 'the claim' because the claimant failed to attend the hearing under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.