Case 2407327/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Burgess v A.M. London Fashion Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2407327/2023
- Decision date
- 21 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Burgess
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 7 January 2024, the Tribunal gave Miss A Burgess an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claim had not been actively pursued, that the claimant had not complied with an order of the Tribunal, and that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Leach ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive underlying claim type. The claim was struck out after the claimant failed to make written representations, made insufficient representations, or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's 7 January 2024 letter concerning active pursuit, compliance with an order, and reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.