Case 2407349/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Zambrano v Maria Jose Montatixe Molina trading as Landina Latina — 2021
- Case reference
- 2407349/2021
- Decision date
- 26 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Newstead Taylor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Zambrano
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 18 November 2021, Employment Judge Newstead Taylor sat alone and, by agreement, amended the respondent's name to Maria Jose Montatixe Molina trading as Landina Latina. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the agreed gross sum of £414.20 in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's separate claim for financial compensation pursuant to section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The judgment record was sent to the parties on 26 November 2021, and the attached notice stated that unpaid sums would carry interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the agreed gross sum of £414.20. | Upheld | — | £414 |
| Other | The claimant's separate claim for financial compensation pursuant to section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed. The written record gives no further reasons for that dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £414
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.