Case 2407352/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Salim v I Quote Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2407352/2021
- Decision date
- 13 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Salim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 and found the unfair dismissal complaint under section 104 Employment Rights Act 1996 well founded. It held that Mr Salim was unfairly dismissed because he asserted a statutory right. Because section 119 ERA 1996 required one complete year of service and that threshold was not met, no basic award was made.
The tribunal awarded a compensatory award of £9,781.84 for unfair dismissal. That figure included £450 for loss of statutory rights and £9,331.84 for loss of earnings over the period from 17 May 2021 to 16 December 2021. No compensation was awarded for the first four weeks after dismissal because notice pay was dealt with separately.
On the remaining claims, the tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,500 damages, described as a net figure calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the amount would be treated as post-employment notice pay. It also found that holiday entitlement had not been paid and awarded £750 gross, and that there had been an unauthorised deduction from wages and awarded £1,860 gross.
The total amount payable was £14,891.84. The tribunal noted that the recoupment regulations did not apply because no recoupable state benefits had been received. It also said it had no power to make an award for stress and anxiety in this case, and the accompanying interest notice stated that the stipulated interest rate was 8% if sums remained unpaid after 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the section 104 Employment Rights Act 1996 unfair dismissal complaint well founded because the claimant was dismissed after asserting a statutory right. No basic award was made because section 119 ERA 1996 requires one year of service, which the claimant did not have. | Upheld | — | £9,782 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,500 as a net figure calculated using gross pay to reflect likely tax treatment as post-employment notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,500 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £750 gross, subject to tax and national insurance deductions. | Upheld | — | £750 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found there had been an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,860 gross, subject to tax and national insurance deductions. | Upheld | — | £1,860 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,892
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £9,782
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 104 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 119 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.