Case 2407366/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Ball v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2025
- Case reference
- 2407366/2024
- Decision date
- 4 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Ball
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Dunlop on 4 December 2025, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The judgment records two case-management outcomes rather than a final merits decision.
The claimant's complaint of disability discrimination, specified as failure to make reasonable adjustments, was found to have no reasonable prospect of success and was struck out. The claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was allowed to proceed to a final hearing. The written record states that oral reasons were given and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of disability discrimination, identified as failure to make reasonable adjustments, had no reasonable prospect of success and was struck out. Written reasons were not provided in the text. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal complaint will proceed to a final hearing; it was not finally adjudicated in this preliminary hearing judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.