Case 2407382/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Erin Giles v MKDJLW1 Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2407382/2024
- Decision date
- 29 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Erin Giles
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Aspinall heard the case at Liverpool on 15 April 2025. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent, MKDJLW1 Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation), did not appear. The Tribunal upheld the claimant's claims for a statutory redundancy payment, breach of contract notice pay, and unauthorised deduction from wages. The holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal.
The respondent was ordered to pay £6,760 in total, comprising a statutory redundancy payment of £2,000 (4 x 1 x £500), notice pay of £2,000, and unauthorised deductions of £2,760 (June salary at full gross rate of £2,000 and July salary at lay-off rate of 20 x £38, totalling £760).
Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The judgment was approved for promulgation on 15 April 2025 and sent to the parties on 29 April 2025.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment calculated as 4 x 1 x £500. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded at £2,000. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Comprises June salary at full gross rate £2,000 and July salary at lay-off rate (20 x £38) £760. | Upheld | — | £2,760 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded in the judgment as dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,760
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.