Case 2407390/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C McGann v Nobles Constructions Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2407390/2021
- Decision date
- 10 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C McGann
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr C McGann's claim against Nobles Constructions Ltd. The reasons state that the respondent was in administration, and that by letter dated 27 July 2021 the claimant had been told a claim against a respondent in administration could not be pursued without the consent of the administrator or the permission of the court.
The claim was stayed to allow the claimant to seek permission to proceed, with the stay said to last six months. The claimant did not confirm to the tribunal whether permission had been sought during the stay or when it expired.
By letter dated 5 April 2022, the claimant was told it was proposed that the claim be struck out because it was not being actively pursued. He was given 14 days to make written representations or request a hearing, but he did neither. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The reasons do not specify the underlying substantive claim type(s); the judgment records only that the claim was struck out because the respondent was in administration and the claimant did not pursue permission or make representations. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.