Case 2407394/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Gomes (1) Mr C Errico (2) v Playworks Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2407394/2021
- Decision date
- 3 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Gomes (1) Mr C Errico (2)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Johnson at Manchester on 25 October 2021. The respondent did not attend. Both claimants attended in person and were unrepresented. The tribunal permitted the first claimant to amend his claim to add complaints of breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, and holiday pay.
The first claimant succeeded on unfair dismissal, breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, and holiday pay. The judgment states that each of those complaints was well founded. No remedy figures were determined in this decision.
The second claimant succeeded on unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and holiday pay. His complaint for a redundancy payment was dismissed because insufficient evidence was available to show that a redundancy had arisen. The tribunal recorded that remedy for the successful complaints would be dealt with at a later hearing.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | First claimant. The tribunal permitted amendment to add this complaint and found it well founded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | First claimant. The tribunal found the complaint well founded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | First claimant. The tribunal found the complaint well founded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | First claimant. The tribunal found he was unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Second claimant. The tribunal dismissed this complaint because insufficient evidence was available to demonstrate that a redundancy had arisen. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Second claimant. The tribunal found the complaint well founded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Second claimant. The tribunal found the complaint well founded. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.