Case 2407428/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Jones v Langton Law Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2407428/2024
- Decision date
- 30 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the claim under Rule 22 because the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time. On that basis, Employment Judge Phil Allen made a determination on the papers rather than after a contested hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £3,170.79 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £573.12 gross damages. The notice-period figure was calculated by reference to £9,512.37 that would have been earned, less £8,939.25 earned during the notice period for a different company, and the judgment states the award was calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood of tax being payable as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay accrued but untaken holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £535.61 gross. The total payable under the judgment was £4,279.52. The written notice also states that interest is generally payable on tribunal awards, subject to payment within 14 days, but no separate interest figure is set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,170.79. | Upheld | — | £3,171 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded gross damages of £573.12, calculated by taking £9,512.37 that would have been earned and deducting £8,939.25 earned during the notice period for a different company. | Upheld | — | £573 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's accrued but untaken holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £535.61 gross. | Upheld | — | £536 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,280
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.