Case 2407466/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Shepherd v Italian Catering Concept Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2407466/2021
- Decision date
- 12 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Shepherd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Liverpool on 27 September 2021, before Employment Judge Benson sitting alone, the tribunal recorded by consent that the respondent had breached the claimant's contract. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £158.71 net.
The judgment also records that the claims of unlawful deductions from pay in respect of one week's pay and a claim of detriment contrary to section 45A(f) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 were to proceed to a final hearing on 28 and 29 June 2022. No liability finding was made on those claims in this judgment.
The tribunal further stated that all other claims were dismissed on withdrawal. The short judgment contains no further factual findings or reasoning beyond those orders, and the notice on interest states the standard 8% rate if sums remain unpaid after 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | By consent, the respondent was found to have breached the claimant's contract and was ordered to pay £158.71 net. | Upheld | — | £159 |
| Other | The judgment states that all other claims were dismissed on withdrawal, but it does not identify each withdrawn claim individually. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £159
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.