Case 2407488/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Wilkinson v Ken Mills Engineering Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2407488/2021
- Decision date
- 12 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Wilkinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 6 October 2021, Employment Judge Rice-Birchall heard Mr S Wilkinson's claims against Ken Mills Engineering Limited. The tribunal held that the claimant was wrongfully and unfairly dismissed, and those claims succeeded. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's claim for arrears of pay was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. His claim for holiday pay failed and was dismissed. The extracted judgment does not record any monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant's claim for arrears of pay was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant's holiday pay claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.