Case 2407499/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Tyldesley v Blueberry Box Limited (in Creditor’s Voluntary Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2407499/2021
- Decision date
- 11 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Tyldesley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ross found that Miss J Tyldesley was unfairly dismissed and wrongfully dismissed by Blueberry Box Limited (in Creditor’s Voluntary Liquidation). The wrongful dismissal award was 12 weeks’ pay in lieu of notice, assessed at £3,323.28 based on net weekly pay of £276.94.
The tribunal also recorded that the respondent failed to provide written particulars of employment and awarded four weeks’ pay of £1,308. No separate reasons for that award are set out beyond the wording of the judgment.
For unfair dismissal, the basic award was assessed at £7,848. The tribunal found that the claimant had worked for the respondent from 24 January 2002 until dismissal on 28 April 2021, giving 19 years’ service, including 10 years when she was aged over 41, and applied 24 weeks at £327.
The compensatory award for unfair dismissal covered the period from 21 July 2021, when the notice period expired, to October 2021, by which time the claimant had obtained new employment. The tribunal used 13 weeks at £276.94 per week to reach £3,600.22, then added £500 for loss of statutory rights and £115 for expenses, producing a total compensatory award of £4,215.22. The grand total of compensation for unfair dismissal was £13,694.50, with a prescribed element of £4,215.22 for the period 21 July 2021 to 7 October 2021 and an excess over the prescribed element of £9,749.28.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £13,695 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,323 |
| Other | The judgment awards four weeks' pay for failure to provide written particulars of employment; no separate statutory label is given in the text. | Upheld | — | £1,308 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,695
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £7,848
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,215
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.