Case 2407526/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. R. Hulmes v Magma Granite Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2407526/2021
- Decision date
- 16 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. R. Hulmes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge T. Vincent Ryan heard the case at Mold by CVP on 15 February 2022. The claimant, Mr R. Hulmes, represented himself and the respondent, Magma Granite Ltd, was represented by its managing director, Mr A.S.P. Parry.
The tribunal held that the respondent breached the claimant's contract in relation to notice of termination of employment. It found the claimant's claim well-founded and allowed it.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £400 in respect of that breach, subject to tax and National Insurance. Written reasons were not provided because the judgment was given orally and no request for reasons was made at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the respondent breached the claimant's contract in relation to notice of termination of employment and awarded £400, subject to tax/National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £400
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.