Case 2407548/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Janovsky v Better Recruitment Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2407548/2021
- Decision date
- 24 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Janovsky
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Batten found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from Mr A Janovsky's wages. The tribunal ordered Better Recruitment Services Limited to pay the claimant the gross/net sum of £61.20.
The judgment also records that the hearing listed for 13 October 2021 was cancelled. No other claims or remedies are set out in the extracted text.
An attached notice explains the tribunal's interest regime under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, including that interest would accrue if the sum remained unpaid after 14 days from the relevant decision day, but no separate quantified interest award is stated in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; tribunal ordered repayment of the gross/net sum of £61.20. | Upheld | — | £61 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £61
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.