Case 2407550/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Ben Kahla v Salpricate Trading UK Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2407550/2021
- Decision date
- 11 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Ben Kahla
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Ben Kahla brought a wages claim against Salpricate Trading UK Limited. The tribunal amended the respondent’s name to Salpricate Trading UK Limited and recorded that the respondent did not defend the claim or attend the hearing, which took place in Liverpool on 5 November 2021 before Employment Judge Benson.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages. It therefore upheld the wages claim and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £4,386.00.
The written record also includes the standard notice on tribunal interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that unpaid sums may carry interest if not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day. No separate interest figure was specified in the judgment record itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent did not attend or defend the claim. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £4,386.00. | Upheld | — | £4,386 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,386
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.