Case 2407559/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Medcalf-Wilson v Hayllar Farms — 2024
- Case reference
- 2407559/2023
- Decision date
- 5 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Medcalf-Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal applied Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure and struck out the claim. It recorded that the claimant presented her claim on 20 July 2023, that notice of the claim and the final hearing were sent on 9 August 2023, and that she was directed to provide a document setting out her losses and to exchange documents by specified deadlines.
The tribunal found that, after those steps, the claimant did not contact the North West regional tribunal office and appeared not to have contacted the respondent either. Although she emailed the Wales Employment Tribunal Office on 17 November 2023 saying that she would not be able to attend the final hearing, she was then told to send correspondence to the North West Region and was given the correct email address. She did not contact the tribunal again, and she did not respond to the later opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on the question of strike out. The tribunal concluded that the claimant had not pursued the claim actively and that there was no reason why it should not be struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The reasons do not separately identify this claim type; it is inferred from the case listing and the tribunal's reference to 'the claim' being struck out. The tribunal said the claimant had not actively pursued the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The reasons do not separately identify this claim type; it is inferred from the case listing and the tribunal's reference to 'the claim' being struck out. The tribunal said the claimant had not actively pursued the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.