Case 2407570/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Almond v Thornhills Solicitors Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2407570/2021
- Decision date
- 19 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Almond
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. Employment Judge Batten recorded that Mrs D Almond was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded her a redundancy payment of £6,878.61. The judgment also found that she was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, with damages of £3,290.64 ordered.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,794.42 gross. The hearing listed for 26 October 2021 was cancelled. The judgment includes the standard notice on interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, but it does not set out any separate interest figure in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,878.61. | Upheld | — | £6,879 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £3,290.64. | Upheld | — | £3,291 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and orders payment of £1,794.42 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,794 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,964
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.