Case 2407573/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Glonczi v The Fallowfield Lodge — 2021
- Case reference
- 2407573/2021
- Decision date
- 30 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Glonczi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs M Glonczi's application for interim relief was heard at Manchester on 11 August 2021 before Employment Judge Feeney. The claimant did not attend. The respondent was represented by Mr L Mahdi, manager. The written judgment sent to the parties on 30 September 2021 states that the claimant's application for interim relief in connection with section 103A and sections 100(1)(a)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed.
The record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The written decision does not set out any detailed findings on the underlying liability issues and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The claimant's application for interim relief in connection with section 103A ERA 1996 was dismissed. The judgment does not contain substantive findings on liability because reasons were given orally. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The same interim relief judgment also referred to sections 100(1)(a)(b) ERA 1996. No separate merits determination is recorded in the written judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.