Case 2407592/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Brinkworth v Freshways t/a Manchester Dairy Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2407592/2021
- Decision date
- 8 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ficklin REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Brinkworth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remote hearing on 5 August 2022 before Employment Judge Ficklin in Manchester, neither party appeared. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had brought claims for unfair dismissal, notice pay, holiday pay and arrears of pay.
The tribunal dismissed all four claims under rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend and there was no evidence available to prove the case. No substantive findings were made on liability, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend and no evidence was available to prove the case. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend and no evidence was available to prove the case. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend and no evidence was available to prove the case. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay claim dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend and no evidence was available to prove the case. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.