Case 2407599/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Baxenden v Crabb and Roberts Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2407599/2023
- Decision date
- 22 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mr I Frame, Ms C Gallagher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Baxenden
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Baxenden's case against Crabb and Roberts Limited was heard at Manchester on 24 March 2025 before Employment Judge Feeney, sitting with Mr I Frame and Ms C Gallagher. The written judgment records that the Tribunal unanimously ordered that the respondent be struck out for failure to comply with Tribunal orders under Rule 38(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The case was listed in the breach of contract and disability discrimination categories, but the written decision does not make merits findings on those claims. It also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the record of decision, and it records no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment records only a strike-out for failure to comply with Tribunal orders under Rule 38(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024; the breach of contract category is taken from the gov.uk listing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment records only a strike-out for failure to comply with Tribunal orders under Rule 38(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024; the disability discrimination category is taken from the gov.uk listing. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.