Case 2407622/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Bessassi v MAG Airport Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2407622/2023
- Decision date
- 2 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Bessassi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 20 June 2024, Employment Judge Slater dealt with strike-out applications and one withdrawal. The complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. The protected disclosure detriment complaint identified as D1, concerning failure to provide the claimant with the outcome of a grievance made in February 2023, and the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments were not struck out, so they were not finally determined in this decision.
The other protected disclosure detriment complaints, D2 to D4, were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. The breach of contract complaint was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Protected disclosure detriment complaint D1, concerning failure to provide the claimant with the outcome of a grievance made in February 2023; application to strike out was refused, so this judgment did not finally determine the claim. | Other | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Protected disclosure detriment complaint D2 was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Protected disclosure detriment complaint D3 was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Protected disclosure detriment complaint D4 was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments; application to strike out was refused, so this judgment did not finally determine the claim. |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.