Case 2407627/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E L Strutt v J T Griffiths & Co. Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2407627/2023
- Decision date
- 12 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E L Strutt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the claim under Rule 21 after the respondent did not present a response. Employment Judge Horne held that Mrs E L Strutt was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £3,003.00, from which £1,771.73 already paid by the respondent was deducted, leaving £1,231.27 payable.
The tribunal also found that the respondent breached the claimant's contract by failing to pay the full contractual redundancy payment and ordered damages of £250.71 net, in addition to the statutory redundancy payment. The total net sum payable under the judgment was £1,481.98. The attached notice states that interest would be payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the award remained unpaid after 14 days, with 12 February 2024 as the relevant decision day and 8% per annum as the stipulated rate.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment of £3,003.00 less £1,771.73 already paid by the respondent, leaving £1,231.27 payable. | Upheld | — | £1,231 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for failing to pay the full contractual redundancy payment, ordered in addition to the statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £251 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,482
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.