Case 2407742/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A J Dalton v Precedent Surveyors Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2407742/2023
- Decision date
- 29 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A J Dalton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claimant's claim for a redundancy payment. It had previously written on 9 December 2023 giving the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that he appeared to have insufficient service with the respondent to bring such a claim and that the Tribunal therefore did not have jurisdiction to hear it.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. For that reason, the redundancy payment claim was struck out.
The judgment states that the claimant's other claims were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | By letter dated 9 December 2023, the Tribunal invited the claimant to explain why the redundancy payment claim should not be struck out because he appeared to have insufficient service with the respondent to bring such a claim, so the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction. No written or sufficient representations were received, and no hearing was requested. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.