Case 2407744/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Matthew Low v Peninsula Business Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2407744/2023
- Decision date
- 5 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Matthew Low
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed both claims before it. It found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was not well-founded and that the complaint of breach of contract was also not well-founded.
The judgment records that, in light of those claims not being upheld, the claimant accepted that he owed the respondent £656.64. By consent, the tribunal ordered the claimant to pay that sum to the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the breach of contract complaint was not well-founded. Following the dismissal of the claims, the claimant accepted he owed the respondent £656.64, which the tribunal ordered by consent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £657
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.