Case 2407815/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Dr H Jimenez v Advanced Oncotherapy plc HELD AT: Manchester — 2024
- Case reference
- 2407815/2023
- Decision date
- 12 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr H Jimenez
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the respondent had admitted in its ET3 that the claimant was entitled to unpaid salary for May to July 2023, a retention bonus payable in June 2023, and payment in respect of salary deductions for the employee contribution to the claimant's personal pension. The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £19,315.37 in settlement of the complaints of unlawful deduction from wages.
The claimant accepted that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine complaints about unpaid employer pension contributions and the cessation of health insurance benefit payments. Those complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The claimant's application to amend the claim to add further unpaid wages arising after presentation of the original claim was allowed, in the absence of objection from the respondent and given the respondent's non-attendance. That amended complaint was left to be addressed through case management orders in the wider Jimenez multiple.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent admitted entitlement to unpaid salary, a retention bonus, and salary deductions for the employee pension contribution in its ET3. | Upheld | — | £19,315 |
| Other | The claimant accepted that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine the complaint about unpaid pension contributions which should have been made by the respondent on the claimant's behalf, and agreed it could be dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The claimant accepted that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine the complaint about cessation of payments in respect of health insurance benefits, and agreed it could be dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,315
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.