Case 2407876/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Carter v HSG Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2407876/2023
- Decision date
- 13 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Carter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by video at Manchester Employment Tribunal on 5 October 2023 before Employment Judge M Butler. The claimant, Mr J Carter, was self-represented and the respondent, HSG Services Ltd, was represented by Mr S Power.
The tribunal dismissed the claim for unpaid holiday pay, finding that it was not well-founded. It also dismissed the breach of contract claim in respect of notice pay, again finding that it was not well-founded.
For the avoidance of doubt, the judgment states that all claims in the case did not succeed and were dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay; tribunal said it was not well-founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for breach of contract in respect of notice pay; tribunal said it was not well-founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.