Case 2407905/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Makin v T H Plumbing & Heating (NW) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2407905/2023
- Decision date
- 30 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Makin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the tribunal recorded two monetary liabilities against T H Plumbing & Heating (NW) Limited. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,076.90 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £415.38. The judgment does not set out detailed factual findings or legal reasoning beyond those recorded orders, and it includes the standard notice about interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from wages and was ordered to pay £2,076.90 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,077 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent was found to have failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £415.38. | Upheld | — | £415 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,492
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.