Case 2407906/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Turner v Pure Clean Waste Solutions Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2407906/2022
- Decision date
- 9 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Turner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr P Turner brought a claim for unpaid notice pay against Pure Clean Waste Solutions Limited. The tribunal found that his contractual notice period was 1 week and that he gave notice in writing but was not paid for that notice period.
The respondent argued that it was entitled to dismiss the claimant because he was guilty of gross misconduct, but the tribunal found that the respondent was unable to prove gross misconduct. On that basis, the claimant's claim for unpaid notice pay succeeded.
The tribunal awarded the gross sum of £961 in respect of the unpaid notice pay. It also noted that other contractual disputes may remain between the parties, but said those matters did not form part of the claim before the tribunal and were outside its jurisdiction in these proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for unpaid contractual notice pay. The tribunal found the contractual notice period was 1 week and that the claimant gave notice in writing but was not paid for that notice period. | Upheld | — | £961 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £961
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.